Scientific Know-How
Monday, May 30, 2022
Sunspots
I Spy With My Little Loupe, part 2
Friends came for lunch on Sunday, and I pulled out my loupe and my phone to show them how I'd been taking photos with them. Their six year old daughter found this very interesting, so we took some photos together. She kept bringing me more things to photograph.
A dandelion leaf |
A dandelion flower |
A seed from that flower |
A few strands of her hair |
The tip of a pencil and some marks it made |
A dandelion stem |
The base of the flower after she pulled all the seeds out |
Ballpoint pen marks on paper |
The tip of the pen |
Sunday, May 22, 2022
I Spy With My Little Loupe
After spending some time looking at the large and distant with binoculars and telescope, I thought I'd like to look at the small and near, especially when the planets, weather, and my work schedule fail to cooperate.
After reading Microscopy as a Hobbby by Mol Smith, I decided to start with something even more basic: a 10x loupe. Another of Smith's books, I Spy with my Little Loupe, helped me decide what to buy. It also gave tips on using my cell phone camera to take photos through my loupe.
As I only have two hands, I found juggling my phone, loupe, and specimens awkward until I hit on the idea of using a steel cookie sheet as a work surface, and holding my loupe in place with magnets:
I used a sheet of printer paper as a background. My loupe's built-in LEDs provided reasonably good lighting.
What to look at first? Adventures with a Hand Lens by Richard Headstrom suggested looking at the paper itself:
It had a fine texture, but 10x magnification was enough to see the fibers. Next I tried a page of Headstrom's book. The texture was a bit courser, and when I zoomed in, I could see the ink had bled a little beyond the border of each printed letter.
I zoomed in on a photo of a daisy in the same book. The ink in the photo made a woven pattern distinct from the fibers of the paper.
I didn't have a newspaper handy, so I tried a bit of paper towel. Much coarser fibers, and a pattern of dots embossed in it:
Headstrom suggested cloth. Here are the fibers of a knit shirt, lit from behind:
Pepper suggested salt. Its crystals were transparent cubes:
I wondered if sea salt crystals would look different. Its crystals seemed to be larger and more rectangular:
MSG had long, thin crystals. I couldn't determine the cross-sectional shape at this magnification.
Not surprisingly, kosher salt had larger crystals:
Saturday, August 7, 2021
Scratch-Built Wimshurst
It took me a while, but I got my Wimshurst up and running. It's a bit rough but, once I added the Leyden jars, it sparked on the first try. I should have checked the motors' direction of rotation before installing them—they got in the way of the neutralizers. I replaced the neutralizers with AWG 20 stranded copper, which I then routed around the motors. It's not pretty, but it works. I don't know whether it reduces the output.
Sewing machine motors were 17.50 USD on Amazon, and included bracket, speed controller, belt, extra brushes and springs, and other spare parts. I had planned to use one motor with a complicated system of pulleys to run a single belt with no crossing, but decided to use a motor on each side with the included belt.
I'm thinking of building an improved machine using what I learned from making this one, and documenting the build, including what worked and, more importantly, what didn't. This is my third Wimshurst. The first didn't work, the second was built from the AstroMedia kit. I thought beginners might find my plans useful.
Dr. Antonio Queiroz' machines are beautiful, but they're all hand-cranked. I want my hands free to perform experiments. Dr. Jefimenko's machine (in his appendix to Electrostatic Experiments) is good, but the appendix is somewhat lacking in mechanical details. R.A. Ford's machine (Homemade Lightning) and Jake von Slatt's (published in Make magazine and also on his web site: http://steampunkworkshop.com/how-build-wimshurst.../ ) were both very specific, but seemed to use expensive parts, mostly as a matter of style.
What do you think? Would detailed plans for a robust and economical motor-driven machine be useful to the beginner, or would that be reinventing the wheel?
Saturday, August 8, 2020
AstroMedia Wimshurst Machine pt. 2
Building the AstroMedia Wimshurst Machine
While I waited for my kit to arrive I started gathering the tools and materials recommended on the maker’s web page. Since the site is in German, and I wasn’t sure about Google’s translation or what the US equivalent would be for some European products, I asked for help on http://www.papermodelers.com/ . I ended up buying Beacon 527, UHU all-purpose adhesive, super glue gel, and E6000. I already had epoxy, Scotch tape, and all the tools I needed. I ended up not using the E6000, and the epoxy gave way the first time I turned the crank, so I rebuilt the crank with a #6 machine screw and J-B Weld Steel-Reinforced Epoxy.
The instruction booklet was 16 pages, 8.25” x 11.625” (210 mm x 296 mm). I assume it was translated from German to English. It was a good translation, quite clear, but more pictures would have been helpful. I didn’t have to look far: the maker put step-by step photos on his website: http://michelswunderland.de/solderiron/wims.html . Very helpful. If you’re considering this kit, you can follow every step in these photos, and see exactly what construction entails.
I had planned to take photos during construction, but this is a very time-intensive build. The maker says to allow 8 to 15 hours’ construction time. If I built several in a row, I might approach those times, but this is the most I’ve ever spent on a model, so I proceeded with caution. I had two weeks’ vacation, and I worked on it several hours every day (and night, often into the next day). I finished on the tenth day at 8 pm. If I’d stopped for photos, I don’t know when I would have finished, but not during this vacation, and I don’t think I could have added much to the step-by-step photos linked above.
I don’t know what the parts count was, but it’s high. I was glad the parts were clearly labeled. The instructions are broken into chapters A through S, and each part is printed with a letter and number. The letter matches the corresponding chapter, and the numbers generally follow the order of assembly. Each step calls out every part by letter and number. Better yet, on each side of each part is a symbol followed by the letter and number of the part that gets glued to that side. I still made a few errors, occasionally gluing a part with the wrong side out, but these were minor cosmetic flaws, not functional problems. I give this numbering system credit.
The instructions recommend cutting, rather than tearing out the parts (they are die-cut, with multiple >1mm tabs on their perimeters holding them in place) and I started cutting each part carefully with a sharpened (I use a diamond hone) #11 X Acto blade. I later found that if I pressed on the edge of the part next to each tab with a toothpick, the tabs would tear neatly. The toothpick concentrated the force so that if I stopped pressing at the first sign of bending, I wouldn’t crease or curl the part. This greatly reduced cutting time, and the tabs cleaned up quickly with sandpaper or a nail file.
Almost every part is built up from multiple layers of card glued together. I knew it would be critical to spread a layer of glue that would cover the entire surface, but thin enough to avoid wrinkling. I also knew the glues I had experience with would not do. I cut a sheet of Bristol Board from my stockpile in four pieces, and glued two with UHU and two with Beacon 527, and pressed them between two boards to dry. The next day, both were well-bonded, with no hint of a wrinkle. Their respective web sites list UHU dry time 10 minutes, cure time 24 hours, and 527 dry time 1 hour, cure time 24 hours. For some parts, I was glad for Beacon’s longer working time. For others, I was glad for UHU’s quicker dry time. Thanks to rickstef on papermodelers.com for recommending Beacon 527. It works great, I can get it at my local Walmart, (I used two tubes of it on this model) and UHU costs four times as much.
As the major structural members, the base and supports require strength and rigidity. each starts with gluing two layers of card together, adding perpendicular zig-zag pieces for support, then gluing another double layer on top. Then a strip around the edge covers everything neatly to make strong and good-looking slab. It’s an impressive bit of paper engineering. I probably would have cut them from wood to save time.
I found a small kitchen spatula with a flexible 1” x 2” (2.5 cm x 5 cm) silicone blade an effective tool for spreading a thin, even layer of glue over a large surface. as soon as the glue dries, flex the blade, and the glue peels off.
The web instructions suggest the option of mounting the base on a slightly larger piece of plywood for improved stability, and adding rubber feet to the plywood to keep it from sliding. I did, and I’m happy with the result.
The brass inserts in the terminal strips that hold the brushes appear to have been replaced with steel. I couldn’t get the inserts out of the plastic strip, but I cut the strip into six pieces, and it works.
The “Adjustment” or “Calibration” bench is a clever way of squaring the disks and hubs to the axle, so they run true, an important and sometimes tricky aspect of any Wimshurst design.
The disks are 210 mm (8.27”) in diameter. The disk segments are precut in adhesive-backed aluminum foil. They are cut with four straight sides. This will work, but the sharp corners will be prone to corona discharge, reducing the output voltage. I used Dr. Antônio Carlos M. de Queiroz’ WMD program http://www.coe.ufrj.br/%7Eacmq/programs/wmd.zip to design the sectors. Using the numbers from WMD, I drew a template with a ruler and compass, traced it on the precut sectors with an Ultrafine Sharpie, and cut them out. Because the sectors were precut, I could only make them rounded by removing material. Dissatisfied with that result, I took my template and marked out new sectors on aluminum foil tape, and cut them by hand. The sector pattern in the book was still helpful for positioning the sectors, and I was happier with the rounded sectors I made. Not perfect, but no sharp corners. I found a soft pencil eraser an ideal tool for smoothing the sectors flat against the dish. It left some smudges, some I removed with a damp cloth, and the rest with a Mr. Clean MagicEraser. Then I wiped the disks with a dry towel, and dried them with a hair dryer.
Friday, August 7, 2020
AstroMedia Wimshurst Machine pt.1
AstroMedia ( https://astromedia.de ) specialize in functioning models of machines, including scientific and astronomical instruments. I’d never seen a card model of a Wimshurst Machine before, much less working Wimshurst with many structural parts made of paper. I’d tried building a Wimshurst from scratch, but never got it to work. Someone posted a video of his AstroMedia Wimshurst making sparks on https://www.facebook.com/groups/electrostaticmachines and I was intrigued.
I ordered the kit from AstroMedia’s UK distributor, https://www.astromediashop.co.uk , £44.40 plus shipping. Due to a favorable exchange rate, the total came to about $70. (I opted to pay extra for tracking.)
Everything came neatly packed flat with a layer of packing peanuts to keep it that way.